![]() ![]() ![]() While the Shinebot W400 left us with wet floors, the water trail left from the Braava jet m6 was much lighter and disappeared quickly. The iLife Shinebot W400 cut those cleaning times by more than half, completing the task in just 13 minutes, 44 seconds. It was slightly faster than the Braava jet 240’s time of 31 minutes, 9 seconds. ![]() Using the wet mopping pad, the Braava jet m6 cleaned the same area in 30 minutes and 28 seconds. The type of pad-dry sweeping or wet mopping-attached to the m6 determines the cleaning mode. First, I had to attach the desired cleaning pad to the underside of the bot and add water (or water and cleaning solution) to the tank. After charging for a couple of hours, the m6 was ready to go-almost. Though I wanted to place the Braava jet m6 next to its vacuuming companion, the iRobot Roomba s9+, robot social distancing requirements meant the Braava jet m6 needed 1.5 feet of space on either side and 4 feet of open space in front of it. Setting up the iRobot Braava jet m6 was similar to setting up a robot vacuum. I also greatly preferred it to the drip tray on the Roborock S6 MaxV, which the manufacturer suggested should be affixed directly to the floor. ![]() While initially surprising when it fell off, I liked that it made for easy cleaning. If you pick the dock up to move it, the tray will fall off. The drip tray isn’t so much connected to the dock as it is loosely attached to it. There are guides along the edges and wheel indentations to keep the bot in its place. Once the dock is situated, a large white drip tray attaches to it. The white dock included with the Braava jet m6 has a black infrared sensor band around the top of it. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |